|
With most
of the prominent multinational vendors already in town, the offshore advantage
has today ceased to become the prerogative of Indian IT companies. No
longer do Indian vendors have the luxury of their lower costs
ushering in revenues. Rather, they are finding out (often the hard
way) that investments in marketing and branding have become essential
in view of the intense competition in the marketplace. Marketing can
no longer be relegated away as an ancillary task. Incidentally,
marketing today features amongst the top priorities for Indian
vendors and as Prayag’s second annual marketing best practices
research discovered, marketing and branding priorities have evolved
considerably to figure as a high organizational priority.
Prayag’s second annual marketing study, aimed at evaluating marketing practices across technology companies
with an offshore model, is one of its kind in the industry. The
responses from participating companies far exceeded our expectations;
the study included responses from companies across the breadth of the
IT and BPO industry. The highlight of the study is that it provides
an insight as to how marketing activities have evolved over time, and
how these differ across the varying categories of players.
|
Profile of Respondents
|
|
< $10 Million
|
45%
|
|
<$10
-$100Million
|
25%
|
|
$100-$500 Million
|
19%
|
|
$500 Million -$1
Billion
|
7%
|
|
$1 Billion+
|
4%
|
All
respondents to the study were categorized on the basis of revenues
and service lines. The respondents were CEO’s, CMO’s, and VP’s of Marketing. The combined revenues of respondents to the study
amounted to over $20 billion.
|
Respondents by revenue
|
|
Respondent Category
|
Combined Revenues ($ Million)
|
|
<
$10 Million
|
$83.25
Million
|
|
<$10
-$100Million
|
$401
Million
|
|
$100-$500
Million
|
$2094
Million
|
|
$500
Million -$1 Billion
|
$750
Million
|
|
$1
Billion+
|
$17.95
Billion
|
|
Total
|
$21.29
Billion
|
The Marketing Practices
study evaluated the marketing activity along three lines. The study
primarily sought to evaluate prioritization of marketing practices across
organizations and how marketing priorities had evolved over the last
year. Here again, it sought to identify the key marketing thrust
areas and compared them vis-à-vis the current focus of marketing
initiatives.

|